DAOthxS / subDAOthxS

GovermentS game

Using the name Satoshi in this way, in my opinion, cannot be the prerogative of some project managed by anything other than a decentralized community. In other words, it is a public good and such SocialFi.
If we consider thxSatoshi as a control of DAOthxS through 21 subDAOthxS, then all 21,000,000 tokenS (21 x 1,000,000) are exactly the same no matter what chain they are on. Based on this logic, all tokenS should have the same name and the same ticker thxS.
Each subDAOthxS will have its own balance sheet/treasury and conduct fairly independent activities, since each (many) ecosystems will be unique and it makes no sense to discuss TokenomicS from this perspective now. DAOthxS will have some influence on these entities through ownership of a portion of the coins in each network, but nothing more.
The price of tokenS in each chain, in my opinion, can and should be formed by market mechanisms. Especially given the trend towards support for ecosystem funds in each (many) networks by different communities and different TVLs in different networks. Again, each subDAO will have its own treasury, and there may well be different revenues; much/everything will depend on specific communities and network effects. And it’s not just about money, but in many ways about social/network/technological/others = XR (@Menaskop called it that in his research and I very much agree with him here). No one is stopping you from doing arbitration if it makes sense/purpose for someone.
DAOthxS management is supposed to be carried out as a “congress of delegates” sent by each subDAOthxS from the ecosystem on identical conditions.. 1 delegate = 10,000 thxS votes, 1 delegate vote.. there can be multi delegates (for example) 1 delegate = 10,000 tonDAOthxS + 10,000 opDAOthxS , that's 2 votes.
Genesis TGE phase (until the launch and orderly functioning of several networks, subDAO) DAOthxS is managed by a group of delegates “101”.

The primary management of DAOthxS and opDAOthxS will be organized in the Optimism network through the Governor from OpenZeppelin contract on Tally and subsequently transformed/evolved according to the opinion of the community through proposals. OpenZeppelin offers options for implementing cross-chain mechanics for EVM (definitely a subject for future R&D)

PreviousR&D #1 Next101

Last updated 9 months ago

DAOthxS / subDAOthxS

GovermentS game

Using the name Satoshi in this way, in my opinion, cannot be the prerogative of some project managed by anything other than a decentralized community. In other words, it is a public good and such SocialFi.
If we consider thxSatoshi as a control of DAOthxS through 21 subDAOthxS, then all 21,000,000 tokenS (21 x 1,000,000) are exactly the same no matter what chain they are on. Based on this logic, all tokenS should have the same name and the same ticker thxS.
Each subDAOthxS will have its own balance sheet/treasury and conduct fairly independent activities, since each (many) ecosystems will be unique and it makes no sense to discuss TokenomicS from this perspective now. DAOthxS will have some influence on these entities through ownership of a portion of the coins in each network, but nothing more.
The price of tokenS in each chain, in my opinion, can and should be formed by market mechanisms. Especially given the trend towards support for ecosystem funds in each (many) networks by different communities and different TVLs in different networks. Again, each subDAO will have its own treasury, and there may well be different revenues; much/everything will depend on specific communities and network effects. And it’s not just about money, but in many ways about social/network/technological/others = XR (@Menaskop called it that in his research and I very much agree with him here). No one is stopping you from doing arbitration if it makes sense/purpose for someone.
DAOthxS management is supposed to be carried out as a “congress of delegates” sent by each subDAOthxS from the ecosystem on identical conditions.. 1 delegate = 10,000 thxS votes, 1 delegate vote.. there can be multi delegates (for example) 1 delegate = 10,000 tonDAOthxS + 10,000 opDAOthxS , that's 2 votes.
Genesis TGE phase (until the launch and orderly functioning of several networks, subDAO) DAOthxS is managed by a group of delegates “101”.

PreviousR&D #1 Next101

Last updated 9 months ago